We brought you the scoop when MINIX announced an all-new Amlogic S905 based TV box two weeks ago. The MINIX NEO U1 is supposed to give similar performance as it’s flagship device the NEO X8-H Plus, while still being less expensive.
But does it succeed? Can the challenger unseat our reigning champion TV box?
Let’s find out with our MINIX NEO U1 review.
NEO U1 or NEO X8-H Plus?
So why should you get the brand new NEO U1 vs the tried-and-true NEO X8-H Plus?
Good question. To hear a MINIX spokesperson tell it: “We are confident the NEO u1 will surpass the NEO X8-H Plus as our flagship model – more features at a lower price.”
That’s a pretty bold statement.
The MINIX NEO U1 offers some features that the NEO X8-H Plus doesn’t have:
- 4K @ 60Hz
- HDMI 2.0
- Support for 10-bit video decoding
- Android Lollipop 5.1.1 out of the box, whereas the NEO X8-H Plus still runs Android 4.4.2.
One of the less obvious changes is the wireless antenna…or should I say antennas? The MINIX NEO U1 actually has two antennae – the obvious external antenna shared by the entire NEO lineup, and a new internal antenna as well.
Does the NEO X-H Plus do anything better than it’s newer, younger sibling?
Actually, yes.
The NEO X8-H Plus may run an older CPU, but it has an 8 (Octa) core GPU as compared to the 5 (Penta) core GPU of the NEO U1.
Also, audiophiles may be disappointed, since the NEO U1 supports a pass-through for Dolby TrueHD, but no DTS-HD support at this time.
So which is better?
It depends what you’re looking for. For most applications, the newer NEO U1 seems to win the specifcation-battle with the NEO X8-H Plus. But, if DTS audio is a deal-breaker for you, you may want to stick with the older (and more expensive) NEO X8-H Plus, for now.
Different layout
As you can see from the pictures above, there is a slightly different port layout between the NEO U1 (top device in the images), and the NEO X8-H Plus (bottom device).
The NEO U1 moves all of the USB 2.0 ports to the side of the device, whereas the X8 series had them split – one on the side and the other two on the rear of the device. To do this, the headphone and microphone jacks have been moved to the rear of the TV box. Finally, gone is the full size SD card slot. It’s replaced by a microSD card slot on the side, which supports cards up to 256GB.
| Specs: MINIX NEO U1 | |
|---|---|
| Processor | Quad Core Cortex A53 Processor (64-Bit) |
| GPU | Penta-Core Mali-450 GPU |
| Memory | 2GB DDR3 |
| Internal Storage | 16GB eMMC 5.0 Storage (MLC) |
| Wireless Connectivity | 802.11ac 2 x 2 MIMO Dual-Band Wi-Fi (2.4GHz/5.0GHz), Bluetooth 4.1 |
| Operating System | Android Lollipop 5.1.1 |
| Video Output | HDMI 2.0, up to 4K @ 60Hz, Supports HDMI-CEC |
| Audio Output | via HDMI 2.0, 3.5mm stereo jack, optical SPDIF |
| Peripheral Interface | RJ-45 Gigabit Ethernet – Supports hotspot sharing via Wi-Fi Micro SD card reader USB 2.0 port x 3, OTG port x 1, Kensington lock ready Microphone Jack, Headphone jack, IR receiver (remote included) |
| Power | DC 5V, 3A adapter included (CE, FCC certified) |
| Supported Video Format | DAT/MPEG/MPE/MPG/TS/TP/VOB/ISO/AVI/MP4/MOV/3GP FLV/MKV/M2TS/MTS/M4V/MWV/ASF |
| Supported Audio Format | MP2/MP3/WMA/WAV/OGG/OGA/FLAC/ALAC/APE/AAC |
Unboxing and Setup
MINIX consistently gives you everything that you need to get started, right out of the box. Well, except for batteries, but I’m not going to hold that against them.
What MINIX includes with their TV boxes hasn’t changed for several generations. There’s an IR remote control, HDMI cable, OTG cable, micro-USB cable, dual-band external antennae and a 5V (3A) power adapter.
The documentation is still very good, and seems to keep getting more detailed with every new model.
MINIX Metro Interface
The MINIX Metro interface has gotten a minor refresh with the move to Android Lollipop 5.1.1.
You’ll see some minor changes in the overall look and feel of the interface – most noticeably the familiar XBMC logo has been replaced by the newer Kodi “K” logo – but more on that later.
Otherwise, a subtle change in the icons themselves is the only outward clue that anything is different.
Under the hood, the changes become more apparent.
The Settings screen has been completely revamped to make the Metro Launcher look more like Google’s Android TV or the NVIDIA Shield. Settings now scroll vertically and horizontally, similar to the main menu on a FireTV or Roku.
Most users won’t see a functional difference, but I did an unscientific study of a few non-technical friends. They all found the newer Settings screen to be much easier to navigate. Icons have been added to the menu system, which takes a lot of the guesswork out of looking for the section you want.
Making it easier for novice users is never a bad thing, right?
MINIX NEO U1 Review: Benchmarks
And now for the moment you’ve all been waiting for….
How does the MINIX NEO U1 fare in benchmark tests? Specifically, how does it compare to the NEO X8-H Plus?
Pretty good evidently. As you can see in the image on the left, the NEO U1 scored 38,738 on AnTuTu Benchmark 6.0.
In our last review, the NEO X8-H Plus scored a 32,275 on AnTuTu Benchmark 5.0, which was 13% faster than the original NEO X8-H we reviewed last year. I re-ran the tests using AnTuTu 6.0 and the NEO X8-H Plus scored 34,102.
The MINIX NEO U1 took an already great benchmark score and beat it by over 13%!
Not every test turned out so good, however.
I ran two other tests: PCMark for Android and 3DMark’s Ice Storm Extreme.
PCMark is designed to be a “real world” test. It tests things like web performance during browsing, looking at and modifying images and testing video playback performance.
The NEO U1 scored slightly higher than the NEO X8-H Plus, but the difference was really negligible: 3098 vs. 3004. The breakdown came in a noticeably higher Web Browsing and Writing Score, but a lower Video Playback score.
Keep in mind that firmware can have a lot to do with this. I’m testing firmware version 001 for the NEO U1 vs. Firmware 007 for the NEO X8-H Plus.
3DMark‘s Ice Storm Extreme has been a standard test here for over a year. It looks at raw video performance as well as putting the physics engine through it’s paces. Typically newer chipsets tend to under-perform in this benchmark because the firmware isn’t as mature as older models. Think of this benchmark as a baseline – it almost always improves as a device gets older.
Here the NEO X8-H Plus scored well above the NEO U1: 5657 to 4317.
Every test (except one) was a win for the NEO X8-H Plus. Overall graphics score and individual framerate results were higher on the NEO X8-H Plus. One curious result was that the physics engine score for the NEO U1 was almost double that of the NEO X8-H Plus. There’s definitely some power under the hood, but, like I said, it’ll take a few tweaks in the firmware to really bring it out.
Kodi 16: Jarvis
MINIX normally bundles a custom version of XBMC with their TV boxes. Since they’re a Diamond Sponsor of the XBMC Foundation, I’ve been wondering why MINIX stayed with XBMC Gotham rather than move to Kodi 14 Helix or 15 Isengard,
For the NEO U1, they’ve addressed this in a big way, skipping two versions of Kodi and going straight to an alpha version of Kodi 16 – Jarvis.
I had no issues with the functionality of the alpha build. In fact, the only problem I encountered at all was a buffering problem. But, one of my most popular articles ever is how to fix the “Kodi buffering” issue, so that was quickly fixed.
Jarvis is nearing completion at the time of this writing, and there have been several beta releases since the alpha build installed on the NEO U1. I was able to install Kodi 16 beta 3 without any issues, so I expect that upgrading to the final release of Kodi 16 will be similarly painless.
The Verdict
I’ve always been a huge fan of MINIX TV boxes, and the new MINIX NEO U1 is no exception. They’ve taken a great design that has been refined over several generations and improved it once again.
There’s support now for 4K video at 60Hz, HDMI 2.0, 10-bit video decoding and Android 5.1.1 – all at a price point that is $30 under the NEO X8-H Plus. The firmware is on it’s first release, so I’m expecting improvements in a few areas. Thankfully, MINIX has been great about keeping their firmware updated and their devices fresh.
With this TV box, it looks like MINIX hasn’t tried to stuff features in that users weren’t interested in. They went for improvements that have real applications for everyday users.
I think you’ll love it.
hi. i wanted to get minix U1. i have a uhd 4k content on my 2tb hard drive. will the minix u1 play uhd content but my tv is only Full HD LG tv. Thank you for your reply.
Hi. If you TV is not 4K, but you’re trying to play 4K content, it will still work, but the TV will only display it at it’s maximum resolution. In your case, it will downgrade it to HD only.
Hi – based on the comments, i have purchased the Minix Neo UI, but i am facing a serious problem here, i am unable to add the google account, i am able to enter my email id and password but its not allowing me to accept and set up the account as the “ACCEPT” button is not enabled or the remote is not allowing to select it. is there a way to it or should i return it back.
Please help me on this……
Hello thank you for great review but could I ask if you could give me your opinion on the MINIX NEO Z64 Android.
I’m either going to upgrade or have two boxes (up & down stairs) but unsure which one to go for.
So I have the z64 since Christmas 2015 and on my list I have
MINIX NEO U1
MINIX X8-H Plus
WeTek Core
Or the other direction is to replace my skybox reciver with
WeTek Play
VU+ DUO2
VU+ SOLE2
And if my main use is kodi for the living room box would i notice much if I had openELEC over Android..
Thank you very much if you get a chance to reply.
Hi Chris. Thanks for the comment!
Right now, I wouldn’t go with the NEO X8-H Plus. It was my choice last year, but since the NEO U1 came out, I’d choose that one instead. The WeTek Core is also a good choice, and has a great support network. Honestly, you can’t go wrong with either of them.
The Play is great if you need a TV tuner integrated. There’s a new version coming out this year, so I’d wait to look at that before you buy. The other two devices, though, aren’t one’s I’m familiar with.
About OpenELEC v Android, if all you’re going to use it for is Kodi, you won’t see a difference other than the OpenELEC box being able to boot straight into Kodi. OpenELEC is a simple, streamlined solution for a box that will only ever be playing Kodi.
Thank you Tim…
I will take your advice onboard and it has assured me that going for the U1 is the right move and I heard that WeTek are releasing something new but I can’t find any news on it fingers crossed for summer release…
Also on wiki it says Kodi 17 will be optimised for Android lollipop and up so anyone considering getting a box new or upgrade bear this in mind, but don’t worry kodi Javis is not dissappearing anytime time soon.
Thanks again Tim Wells…
Hello,
Great review …
But am still stuck between minix X8-H and neo u1.
My usage is more for watching movies through Hdd or online and mostly blue ray contains .
Currently my set up is pioneer AV receiver 5.1 and display support hdmi 1.4
And as you mentioned neo u1 can be deal breaker due to dts audio can you please elaborate this more and how can effect user experience.
Thanks
Hi Sandesh. If your received can support DTS audio and the file that you’re playing supports it, then the Neo U1 is going to be able to use that to the fullest. Personally, I notice picture quality much more than sound quality, so this isn’t a deal breaker to me. However I’ve heard from a lot of readers that are audiophiles, and they tell me that DTS audio is one of the best features to look for in any media device. It all depends whats important to you.
hello, can it play 52 gb blu ray movie from a 2 tb hard drive connected via usb? also, why usb 3.0 not been inlcuded in the device as it will enable smoother playback due to grater data transfer rate?
a 52GB Blu-Ray? My largest movie (3 hours) is just over 30GB. What are you trying to play?
Anyway, including USB 3.0 has to do with the chipset board that the device is built with. In the NEO U1’s case, the board is not USB 3.0 compatible, so it’s stuck with USB 2.0.